Sales Quota Feasibility Calculator

Work backward from quota and test whether the rep has enough closeable opportunity capacity.

2026 U.S. model Free Private in your browser

Build the capacity model

Work backward from quota, then test whether the rep has enough closeable opportunities.

Qualified opportunities a fully productive rep can actively work.

Late opportunities that cannot close in-period are excluded.

Capacity ramp

Earlier months use 0% opportunity capacity.

Compensation and unit economics

Closeable opportunity capacity by month

Rows without an in-period close are excluded from the coverage result.

Start monthCapacityQualified oppsExpected winsExpected bookingsClose month
10%00$04
216%1.90.5$36,0005
332%3.81$72,0006
448%5.81.4$108,0007
564%7.71.9$144,0008
680%9.62.4$180,0009
7100%123$225,00010
8100%123$225,00011
9100%123$225,00012
10100%00$0Outside period
11100%00$0Outside period
12100%00$0Outside period

How to calculate sales quota feasibility

A quota is feasible only when the available funnel can produce enough wins inside the quota period. Start by converting the revenue target into deals, then convert deals into qualified opportunities using the expected win rate.

Required deals = quota ÷ average contract value
Required qualified opportunities = required deals ÷ win rate

The calculator compares that requirement with monthly opportunity capacity. Capacity rises during ramp, and an opportunity counts only when its expected close month falls inside the selected selling period.

Why sales cycle changes the answer

Twelve calendar months do not always create twelve opportunity-start months. With a three-month sales cycle, an opportunity started in month ten is expected to close after a 12-month quota window. Counting it would overstate the capacity available to deliver the current quota.

Last closeable start month = selling months − sales cycle months
Capacity bookings = closeable opportunities × win rate × ACV

How ramp and workload are modeled

Months before the first capacity month use 0% of the fully productive opportunity workload. Capacity then increases evenly through the final ramp month and uses the post-ramp percentage afterward. Treat the defaults as an editable starting point and replace them with cohort data.

  • Use qualified opportunities, not raw leads.
  • Use the average contract value for the same segment and motion.
  • Measure win rate from the same opportunity stage used for capacity.
  • Run downside and upside cases for cycle length and conversion.

Connect quota capacity to compensation

The quota-to-OTE ratio shows the relationship between the target and total target compensation. Capacity gross profit adds a margin view. Neither metric replaces the funnel test: a financially attractive plan can still be operationally impossible when the rep lacks enough closeable opportunities. The guide to setting a realistic sales quota with funnel math explains how to choose, segment, and pressure-test each input. The Account Executive Salary guide explains how quota, OTE, ramp, and territory should fit together before a candidate or employer treats the headline compensation as credible.

Common questions about quota feasibility

How do you calculate whether a sales quota is feasible?

Divide quota by average contract value to find required wins, then divide wins by the qualified-opportunity win rate. Compare those required opportunities with the rep's ramp-adjusted opportunity capacity, counting only opportunities that can close inside the selected selling period.

Why does the calculator exclude late opportunities?

An opportunity started near the end of the period may close after the quota window. The model subtracts the entered sales cycle from the available selling months so those late starts do not inflate current-period capacity.

What counts as opportunity capacity?

Use the number of qualified opportunities a fully productive rep can actively work in one month without reducing deal quality. Do not use raw leads, marketing inquiries, or every open CRM record.

What quota coverage should a plan have?

The tool labels 100% or more as feasible, 85% to 99.9% as tight, and less than 85% as under capacity. Those labels are planning flags, not external benchmarks. Use your own variance and conversion history to choose a safer operating cushion.

Does quota-to-OTE prove a quota is achievable?

No. Quota-to-OTE connects compensation to the revenue target, but it does not prove the territory has enough qualified opportunities, time, capacity, or conversion. The capacity model tests those constraints separately.